Видео

I could not for the life of me figure this out through GPTs or my lecture which chose to skip this. Thank you so so much! Lifesaver!

Finally a tutorial that doesnt teach me like a 3rd grader

*reshape* and *plyr* in year 2024? You need to update your code dear lady!

why the proof is just looping itself like that? Why proof is so weird

what chapter contains this thing?

You're doing a great job, thank you.

You're the goat. thanks for the explanation!

EEEEZ well done

Good

Good job🎉just found your channel

legend man, i reckon that printer spooler thing was causing issues too for me i read something somewhere that mitm attack hides amongst them

u sound hot and delicious

at first i found the background sound annoying but then i realised its kinda sounds like the song in the game "buckshot roulette" so then i was just vibing

i cant believe my eyes you are extremely helpful madame thank youuuu so muchhh

can box-muller be used to sample from normal distributions with different means and standard deviations?

why does theta equal 2pi U2?

Thank you mam❤

Wait hold on, how did he/they even arrive at this conclusion? Did Goode-Toulman empirically test this over and over with many different species? Because that counts as having empirically tested it if we were to look at the original paper. At least I hope that's how it was made up because it's such a bizarre way to figure our missing species count that I would not have expected to work

Seeing ur vids as a stats undergrad 😮😮😮😮 thank you

what is the app/site you use dor drawing :)❤

Where does X^n come from in the equation at 4:54, and how is it ever used? If it isn't used it might as well be an equation in terms of t alone.

I think it's very cool when math comes from biology!

is it not possible to rename the x-axis and y-axis? thanks for the video

It's so nice when a real problem has a concrete answer.

wow

isn't the coordinate vector the point the defines that vector and the coordinate matrix the scaling of the vectors in the non standard basis such that they get me to that coordinate vector?

Oh man, this video was...laminawesome! 👍

This was ANCOVAwesome! 👍

I recently came across a problem involving joint and marginal pdfs and while reading up on it I came across your channel. You've got a lot of nice videos, and I'm glad you're still adding to them!

This video was marginawesome! 👍

This was an amazing video! Also, thanks for the...support 😎

Thanks

Beautifully explain! no words

My final is later today, your content is still a life saver

A lesson is great

how do you not have to consider the pure water going in? does'nt it change the concentration?

Great video but your mic gave me an aneurism

Thanks mam

thanks😊

Many thanks to this post

"Its a very nice" -Borat

Your total number of singular values are 600 i think so. Can you please check?

First. Ah nice that you're back, and what a way to make a return with none other than deriving matrix estimators.

How does your pdf have values greater than 1?

thanks to you !

Shouldn't the Null Hypothesis be the other way around, i.e. Model is not a good fit? As rejecting H0 means success.

Thanks for the help ❤

Thank you so much! Your example really helps me understands The example I was reading from book null hypothesis is : honey cough does. It help cough. So I have one groups treated with honey and their outcome. One groups not treated with honey and their outcome 1. Since we assume honey cough does not work. We have 2* data because the treated group will have same outcome when they are untreated vice versa 2. I calculated the observed outcome. Which is just outcome* treated- outcome * untreated 3. Then form a table with the all assume sharp null hypothesis to form a table of outcome for all combinations 4. Find the number of combinations that have absolute outcome greater than observed 5. Pvalue= number in steps4= seeing effect as big as actual observed I guess I just really don’t get why people do fisher exact test because I understand the formula to get it but not why. If P value is small, just like the lady gets the correct combination. It means the effect of honey is not by chance, basically rejecting null hypothesis

the hum goes crazy

Great lesson I need something on data cleaning in R